|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 13, 2010 14:25:11 GMT
Looking for 5 wins in a row and this could be a dodgy game for us, i predict 4-0 for celtic..
|
|
|
Post by bigdavie on Sept 13, 2010 14:57:19 GMT
going to agree 4-0 the hoops, and hopefully a goal for Stokes.
P.S. i tipped 3-0 v hertz.
|
|
|
Post by reidy on Sept 13, 2010 16:05:54 GMT
i fancy us to win this fairly easy we are starting to click as a team i only hope brown sits out and kayal starts we look a quicker and better side with him in
|
|
hazza
New Member
[M:9125]
Posts: 35
|
Post by hazza on Sept 13, 2010 16:19:42 GMT
I agree Kayal improved the side when he came on. I would play Juarez instead of Ledley as well.
|
|
|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 13, 2010 16:39:34 GMT
I agree Kayal improved the side when he came on. I would play Juarez instead of Ledley as well. I thought Ledley strolled through the game on saturday, he plays a lot better in the middle.
|
|
hazza
New Member
[M:9125]
Posts: 35
|
Post by hazza on Sept 13, 2010 16:54:01 GMT
I've nothing against Ledley. I just prefer Juarez.
|
|
|
Post by gezzabhoy67 on Sept 13, 2010 17:01:18 GMT
another victory and another clean sheet please lenny
|
|
|
Post by reidy on Sept 13, 2010 17:07:45 GMT
ledley was my man of the match on saturday it is up to juarez to force his way into the team we have good options for a change the bench looked strong on saturday long may it continue
|
|
|
Post by VoodooChild on Sept 13, 2010 17:35:56 GMT
3-0 to the good guys. Easy peasy. Killie are p!sh and it'll show this coming Sunday.
|
|
|
Post by gerry on Sept 13, 2010 19:01:35 GMT
I would play Juarez, but it wouldn't be at Ledley's expense. Juarez, Kayal Ledley should be a natural part of our starting 11 from what I have seen. The choice for me is which of Maloney or Forrest also gets a game in the middle of the park. Just now I would go with Ledley, Juarez, Kayal and Forrest. With Maloney and McCourt available as substitutes. Same keeper and back 4 as we have been playing. Murphy and Stokes to start, with Hooper a possible coming on as a sub.
|
|
|
Post by gerry on Sept 13, 2010 19:02:11 GMT
Oh and I hope this is the one where we start really scoring the goals. I would love to do this mob.
|
|
siosal
Full Member
[M:6575]
"Better to die standing, than to live on your knees"
Posts: 137
|
Post by siosal on Sept 13, 2010 19:15:32 GMT
I would play Juarez, but it wouldn't be at Ledley's expense. Juarez, Kayal Ledley should be a natural part of our starting 11 from what I have seen. The choice for me is which of Maloney or Forrest also gets a game in the middle of the park. Just now I would go with Ledley, Juarez, Kayal and Forrest. With Maloney and McCourt available as substitutes. Same keeper and back 4 as we have been playing. Murphy and Stokes to start, with Hooper a possible coming on as a sub. I agree with you 145%. Would be interesting to see Murphy up front with Stokes and Hoops either side. Murphy is a real nuisance and has pace, the other two picking up his flicks would be impossible to defend against. Hail Hail !
|
|
|
Post by gerry on Sept 13, 2010 19:30:41 GMT
I would play Juarez, but it wouldn't be at Ledley's expense. Juarez, Kayal Ledley should be a natural part of our starting 11 from what I have seen. The choice for me is which of Maloney or Forrest also gets a game in the middle of the park. Just now I would go with Ledley, Juarez, Kayal and Forrest. With Maloney and McCourt available as substitutes. Same keeper and back 4 as we have been playing. Murphy and Stokes to start, with Hooper a possible coming on as a sub. I agree with you 145%. Would be interesting to see Murphy up front with Stokes and Hoops either side. Murphy is a real nuisance and has pace, the other two picking up his flicks would be impossible to defend against. Hail Hail ! 145% is a very specific amount to agree by. Murph Stokes and Hooper would be very attacking, my only problem with that would be it leaving us a bit light in midfield. Yhe way \i see it we have Forrest as a natural right winger and Ledley a natural on the left. The will both support the forward two, and do it from wide positions. The only real alternative to that is a 4-5-1, changing to 4-3-3 in attack (which should be most of the time.in that setup I would be looking at Maloney Ledley Kayal Juarez Forrest. Thogh is Kayal is holding i suppose it's more a 4-1-4-1 going to 4-3-3 in attack. I suppose we have the option to use different formations depending on the game and which players are available. Our default shouldI'm excited about how things are going just now. be the 4-4-2 with the players mentioned earlier.
|
|
|
Post by gemster on Sept 15, 2010 20:23:06 GMT
take 1-0 and another victory
|
|
|
Post by Seanybhoy1888 on Sept 15, 2010 20:25:24 GMT
Looking for 5 wins in a row and this could be a dodgy game for us, i predict 4-0 for celtic.. I hope it is dodgy then if that is the outcome.
|
|
|
Post by kingkong on Sept 15, 2010 20:42:49 GMT
Should be a comfy 3-0 to the hoops...
|
|
|
Post by Seanybhoy1888 on Sept 15, 2010 21:07:25 GMT
Should be a comfy 3-0 to the hoops... Are you going John?
|
|
|
Post by tristanonian on Sept 15, 2010 22:18:34 GMT
Too many posters want to tinker with the team. Let's keep the current formation and allow them to gel into a team. Last week's performance was promising enough and with McCourt , Hooper Samaras and Kayal on the bench that should be enough to keep the first choices on their toes. The fight for a place and the priveledge of wearing the Hoops should keep them on a winning run. If not then make changes but too many at once.
|
|
|
Post by jasbhoy on Sept 15, 2010 22:22:39 GMT
I don't care how many we win by, so long as we have a clean sheet, this is more important for the defence's confidence, the goals will come upfront no problem.
|
|
|
Post by Seanybhoy1888 on Sept 15, 2010 22:27:30 GMT
Too many posters want to tinker with the team. Let's keep the current formation and allow them to gel into a team. Last week's performance was promising enough and with McCourt , Hooper Samaras and Kayal on the bench that should be enough to keep the first choices on their toes. The fight for a place and the priveledge of wearing the Hoops should keep them on a winning run. If not then make changes but too many at once. Agreed mate.
|
|
|
Post by patmac on Sept 15, 2010 22:42:32 GMT
i stuck football manager on the pc yesterday and the fixtures for the first weekend funnily enough were us at killie and the huns at home to utd the scores were 3-0 celtic and 2-2 with them so i'll be puttin a couple of quid on it this weekend
|
|
|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 16, 2010 12:00:50 GMT
We have made the best start in 104 years, 4 clean sheets and 12 points, the record is 6 clean sheets and 6 wins, lets go for that, for the record i would play both Forrest and Maloney and play one up front with a 5 man midfield including Juarez, Kayal and Ledley.
|
|
|
Post by kylebhoy on Sept 16, 2010 12:03:47 GMT
i think we can hit 5+ against killie
|
|
colint
Full Member
[M:5675]
Posts: 174
|
Post by colint on Sept 16, 2010 18:51:14 GMT
Comfortable 4-0 win.
|
|
|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 16, 2010 19:41:18 GMT
Looking forward to this one.
|
|
|
Post by elwoodpdowd on Sept 16, 2010 19:50:11 GMT
From what i've seen of klimarnock the season (albeit only highlights) they look to be quite decent, the Finish player looks a cut above the usual at rugby park, and we always find it tough there
so i'm going for a close 2-1 victory for the bhoys
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2010 7:59:06 GMT
it will be tight at rugby park as the pitch is to narrow for our passing game, it will be a fight and i see us winning by the odd goal
|
|
|
Post by delgreco on Sept 17, 2010 8:24:08 GMT
1 nil will do me just fine, I would take 6 nil mind you.
|
|
|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 17, 2010 13:37:33 GMT
James Forrest is out of the game on sunday he has picked up an ankle injury, that will give Juarez or McCourt a chance to win a midfield berth.
|
|
|
Post by thehoopster on Sept 17, 2010 13:48:15 GMT
It's reassuring that we can lose one of our best players so far and be able to replace him with quality alternatives.
|
|