|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 13, 2010 15:13:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Seanybhoy1888 on Sept 13, 2010 15:29:00 GMT
The first page was enough for me. Idiotic, biased 'journalism' from a fool I have never heard of or care to again. The Scotsman, for a broadsheet, needs to look at the inaccuracies and absolute lack of quality from some of their employees.
|
|
|
Post by jasbhoy on Sept 13, 2010 15:36:03 GMT
I posted the same link on an earlier thread (Jum Jeffries) with an added bonus of the "writer's" (I use that term loosely) e-mail address. From the thread: I just read an unbelievably "unbiased" piece from The Scotsman where the hack wears maroon coloured specs and top, go to sport.scotsman.com/sport/Hearts-03-Celtic-Jambos-left.6528080.jp and then e-mail the t*t at banderson@edinburghnews.com.
|
|
|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 13, 2010 15:39:27 GMT
I've not seen that yet.
|
|
|
Post by carson67 on Sept 13, 2010 15:45:11 GMT
Do we expect anything else from these chunts?
|
|
hazza
New Member
[M:9125]
Posts: 35
|
Post by hazza on Sept 13, 2010 15:50:19 GMT
A biased, agenda-driven, ill-informed and badly researched article. Never mind the facts, get the digs in. No doubt his fellow Jambos will lap it up.
|
|
|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 13, 2010 15:51:23 GMT
i like this letter..
The author really has to raise himself above his own bias when acting as a journalist for a quality broadsheet.
To compound matters, the unanimous decsion on television, shown at 10.30pm last night, was that both Celtic goals were clearly onside.
Indeed, the highlights on the bbc website could be paused on 2 separate occassions:
1. When Maloney played to Murphy for the first goal - shown to be onside by some distance.
2. When Stokes played Maloney in for the second, shown to be in line with the last defender and on side.
Thirdly, omitted from the BBC highlights, Samaras scored a good goal that was incorrectly deemed to be offside.
Celtic therefore, suffered at the hands of the referee.
The author, Mr Anderson, rather than complain about Celtic complaining, should have criticsed Jeffires tactics in playing a high line in the game, against a very quick quartet of forwards.
It was a tactic that led to Hearts downfall in the game, and had nothing whatsoever to do with the referee.
|
|
|
Post by patmac on Sept 13, 2010 16:05:40 GMT
twisted
|
|
|
Post by carson67 on Sept 13, 2010 16:08:15 GMT
i like this letter.. The author really has to raise himself above his own bias when acting as a journalist for a quality broadsheet. To compound matters, the unanimous decsion on television, shown at 10.30pm last night, was that both Celtic goals were clearly onside. Indeed, the highlights on the bbc website could be paused on 2 separate occassions: 1. When Maloney played to Murphy for the first goal - shown to be onside by some distance. 2. When Stokes played Maloney in for the second, shown to be in line with the last defender and on side. Thirdly, omitted from the BBC highlights, Samaras scored a good goal that was incorrectly deemed to be offside. Celtic therefore, suffered at the hands of the referee. The author, Mr Anderson, rather than complain about Celtic complaining, should have criticsed Jeffires tactics in playing a high line in the game, against a very quick quartet of forwards. It was a tactic that led to Hearts downfall in the game, and had nothing whatsoever to do with the referee. Yeah well said that man! I knew the first goal was onside,i was right in line with it on the other hand jj wasnt as he was to the left of the linesman and also behind him.Stop yer greeting jj,and i hope you phone the ref and apoligise to him for being a t**
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2010 16:12:13 GMT
i like this letter.. The author really has to raise himself above his own bias when acting as a journalist for a quality broadsheet. To compound matters, the unanimous decsion on television, shown at 10.30pm last night, was that both Celtic goals were clearly onside. Indeed, the highlights on the bbc website could be paused on 2 separate occassions: 1. When Maloney played to Murphy for the first goal - shown to be onside by some distance. 2. When Stokes played Maloney in for the second, shown to be in line with the last defender and on side. Thirdly, omitted from the BBC highlights, Samaras scored a good goal that was incorrectly deemed to be offside. Celtic therefore, suffered at the hands of the referee. The author, Mr Anderson, rather than complain about Celtic complaining, should have criticsed Jeffires tactics in playing a high line in the game, against a very quick quartet of forwards. It was a tactic that led to Hearts downfall in the game, and had nothing whatsoever to do with the referee. That's it in a nutshell
|
|
|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 13, 2010 16:46:47 GMT
Would a Celtic supporting reporter get away with reporting like that?.
|
|
|
Post by bhoybafett on Sept 13, 2010 17:12:04 GMT
After a few paragraphs I got the message, so went to the comments, which were superb, cept for the few obviously biased ones, he is a pure Richard. Hail Hail
|
|
|
Post by tictoc on Sept 13, 2010 17:16:44 GMT
Say what you like,all this bad publicity will come back to haunt us.What reason is there to question 2 perfectly good goals,as shown on TV,if not for some twisted agenda.I fear the worst this season,as if the last wasnt bad enough.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2010 17:29:23 GMT
Lets be honest bhoys ,in this little narrow minded country we dont have any so called journalists fighting our corner even ex celts walker,provan and nicholas etc,when you look at any other countries like spain they have madrid journos backing up their team and the catalonians for barca,in germany the have munich media journos for bayern and dortmund have their media guys that fight and argue points for their club the list is endless in all european countries this is because the people who earn a living working in the media business come from a broad background and can work and print what they want concerning the club they have affinity with knowing their job is not on the line,its entirely different here the media moguls are entirely made up of a bias entrenched dark force that just abhor everything about Celtic and our people,thats why we have various Celtic forums and magazines so we can keep our identity and be be proud of our culture and history.
|
|
|
Post by dan3 on Sept 13, 2010 17:36:49 GMT
After our complaints this was always going to happen,first chance the meedja got they would jump on our complaint,both goals were clearly onside,i found it strange that he said the second was marginal,i thought that goal looked more offside than the first at first glance.It has been said for years and its as true now as it was when first said,WHY LET THE TRUTH GET IN THE WAY OF A STORY.
|
|
|
Post by carson67 on Sept 13, 2010 17:58:58 GMT
|
|
colint
Full Member
[M:5675]
Posts: 174
|
Post by colint on Sept 13, 2010 18:20:12 GMT
As usual the media try to put a different spin on the game. They will not give Celtic any praise for a great win.
|
|
|
Post by ziggyplayedgtar on Sept 13, 2010 18:21:26 GMT
I wonder if the media will retract the lies printed in today's papers, after being proved totally wrong by tv pictures....I won't hold my breath....even fat head Jeffries has issued an apology to the linesman....
|
|
|
Post by henrik on Sept 13, 2010 18:23:35 GMT
You expect that sort off clap trap from the gutter press but, when you read it in what is supposed to be a quality unbiased broadsheet it is disappointing, I would like to think his tenure at the paper will be short.
|
|
|
Post by gerry on Sept 13, 2010 19:44:22 GMT
That article is a disgrace it does nothing but cast aspersions on Celtic. How can a reporter look at an incident in which Celtic scored a goal, a perfectly good one, which led to disgraceful behaviour by the opposition manager and him being sent to the stand. From that we get an article starting with discussing Celtic's "paranoia", how did that come about. It simply looks like a rabble rousing hun seeking a response and writing in a manner designed to do nothing but achieve it.
|
|
|
Post by clydebankcelt on Sept 13, 2010 21:40:53 GMT
It simply looks like a rabble rousing hun seeking a response and writing in a manner designed to do nothing but achieve it. Either that or a worried hun.
|
|
|
Post by patmac on Sept 13, 2010 21:45:12 GMT
It simply looks like a rabble rousing hun seeking a response and writing in a manner designed to do nothing but achieve it. Either that or a worried hun. i like that
|
|
|
Post by gerry on Sept 13, 2010 21:50:45 GMT
It simply looks like a rabble rousing hun seeking a response and writing in a manner designed to do nothing but achieve it. Either that or a worried hun. Good point.
|
|
|
Post by carson67 on Sept 13, 2010 21:59:47 GMT
They have good reason to be worried.I predict we will the league by at least 6 points and win at least 1 cup
HHMT
|
|
|
Post by Tiger on Sept 13, 2010 22:00:53 GMT
tell us something new,get used to it oor kid but dont let it get under your skin
|
|
|
Post by mikbhoy on Sept 13, 2010 22:15:08 GMT
Would a Celtic supporting reporter get away with reporting like that?. Well, aye, about 90 years ago when they were writing for the overtly Catholic "Glasgow Observer" Celtic vs Rangers report 1921: "On the terracing at the Dalmornock end on Saturday there was congregated a gang, thousands strong, including the dregs and scourings of filthy slumdom, unwashed yahoos, jailbirds, night hawks, won't-works, 'burroo barnacles', and pavement pirates, all, or nearly all, in the scarecrow stage of verminous trampdom. This ragged army of insantitary pests was lavishly provided with orange and blue remnants, and these were flaunted in challenge as the football tide flowed this way or that. Practically without cessation for ninety minutes or more, the vagabond scum kept up a strident howl of the 'Boyne Water' chorus. Nothing so designedly provoking, so maliciously insulting, or so beastially ignorant has ever been witnessed even in the wildest exhibitions of Glasgow Orange bigotry.....Blatantly filthy language of the lowest criminal type assailed the shocked ears of decent onlookers. There was no getting away from it, chanted as it was by thousands of voices in bedlamite yells. The stentorian use of filthy language is a crime against the law of the land. Policemen lined the track and listened to the hooligan uproar, yet nothing was done to stop it. The scandal was renewed with increased violence in London Road after the match. Is it possible the blue mob can do just anything and get away with it? Prompt official steps were taken to suppress and prosecute the green brake-club lads who dared to sing 'The Dear Little Shamrock' in Paisley Road. Yet thousands of foul-mouthed and blasphemous Orange ruffians are free to run amok over the East End of Glasgow. How do you account for it?"
|
|
|
Post by gerry on Sept 13, 2010 22:21:43 GMT
Would a Celtic supporting reporter get away with reporting like that?. Well, aye, about 90 years ago when they were writing for the overtly Catholic "Glasgow Observer" Celtic vs Rangers report 1921: "On the terracing at the Dalmornock end on Saturday there was congregated a gang, thousands strong, including the dregs and scourings of filthy slumdom, unwashed yahoos, jailbirds, night hawks, won't-works, 'burroo barnacles', and pavement pirates, all, or nearly all, in the scarecrow stage of verminous trampdom. This ragged army of insantitary pests was lavishly provided with orange and blue remnants, and these were flaunted in challenge as the football tide flowed this way or that. Practically without cessation for ninety minutes or more, the vagabond scum kept up a strident howl of the 'Boyne Water' chorus. Nothing so designedly provoking, so maliciously insulting, or so beastially ignorant has ever been witnessed even in the wildest exhibitions of Glasgow Orange bigotry.....Blatantly filthy language of the lowest criminal type assailed the shocked ears of decent onlookers. There was no getting away from it, chanted as it was by thousands of voices in bedlamite yells. The stentorian use of filthy language is a crime against the law of the land. Policemen lined the track and listened to the hooligan uproar, yet nothing was done to stop it. The scandal was renewed with increased violence in London Road after the match. Is it possible the blue mob can do just anything and get away with it? Prompt official steps were taken to suppress and prosecute the green brake-club lads who dared to sing 'The Dear Little Shamrock' in Paisley Road. Yet thousands of foul-mouthed and blasphemous Orange ruffians are free to run amok over the East End of Glasgow. How do you account for it?" Brilliant, I've got an old mate (retired) who still writes like that, mostly about them. Are you reading this John Joseph?
|
|
|
Post by kylebhoy on Sept 14, 2010 7:09:51 GMT
report is a load of bee's wax but the comments are class
|
|
|
Post by barney on Sept 14, 2010 7:36:18 GMT
Someone had a go at Keevens last night regarding a similar report in the daily ranker. He tried to pass it off as an honest error as the copy was written before anyone had seen the highlights. I would have thought that a call from the ranker to their bretheren at the BBC on Saturday night would have saved them the embarressment all round from the media.
This Anderson guy should be made apologise as not only is it a biased report with no foundation but also a shot across the bows at Celtic in an attempt to discredit the club.
Everyone who reads this should email this paper or call the sports editor now. His name is G Lindsay
|
|
|
Post by tictoc on Sept 14, 2010 10:35:20 GMT
Was that report from the last OF game at Celtic Park?Absolutley brilliant.Well said,that chap.
|
|